Should
mobile phones be banned in cars?
We all know that mobile phone that mobile
phones are a distraction in cars. It is annoying and frightening to see people
taking on their hand-held mobile phones while driving, especially, when their behavior
creates a hazardous situation for everyone on the road. However, banning mobile
phones use in cars is like stuffing a Genie into the bottle. There are certain
obvious cases were mobile phone use truly should be banned, such as teenage
drivers and bus drivers but there are a lot of people who depend on
communicating while driving.
Below we show the results of two recent
studies:
AAA study
This study showed the rank of distraction and
gave the distraction level a score from 1.0 to 5.0. Here are the results:
No
distractions
|
1.00
|
Radio on
|
1.21
|
Audio book
|
1.75
|
Hands-free mobile phone
|
2.27
(talking only, not looking at the mobile phone)
|
Talking to passenger
|
2.33
(passenger unaware of surroundings)
|
Hand-held mobile phone
|
2.45
|
Speech to text
|
3.06
|
Operational span task
|
5.00
(solving a math problem while trying to remember a fact)
|
Virginia Tech & NHTSA study
This study found that the risk of an
accident depended on the specific task associated with mobile phones. Here are
the results:
Task
|
Risk
Range (with 95% confidence)
|
Hand held mobile phone use
|
1.20-2.49
|
Portable Hands-free mobile phone use
|
0.49-2.30
|
Integrated Hands-free mobile phone use
|
0.25-1.31
|
Visual and manual subtask
|
1.91-4.51
|
Putting things in
perspective, accident risk depends on a number of other factors:
- · Speed
Driving (MPH)
|
Risk
|
1
|
5%
|
10
|
1.62%
|
20
|
2.65%
|
- · Choice of roads
There is a huge variation in
accident risk depending on the choice of road. The accident rate on a complex
urban arterial road is about 10 times higher than a motorway.
- · Age
Drivers under 25 years old are at
3x risk of having an accident. Old age is not a big problem until the driver
gets quite old around 70 years old.
- · Gender
Men get in more fatal accidents. Women
get in slightly more fender benders.
- · Alcohol
In California State, a blood
alcohol concentration of 0.08 is the legal limit but any amount of alcohol is
dangerous. A legal drunk driver, about two drinks for most people, is about
equal to teenage driver.
Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC)
|
Relative Risk
|
0.00
|
1.0
|
0.05
|
1.8
|
0.08
|
3.2
|
0.12
|
7.1
|
0.21
|
30.5
|
- · More factors
- All drivers think they are better drivers than they really are.
- Some drivers have mental deficits anger issues that make them far more dangerous than the rest of population.
- Citations for moving violations predict how likely you will be to get in an accident.
These studies are ones
of many that show that any form of talking puts a cognitive load on the brain
and causes a degree of distraction. Also, anything that puts a load on the
brain also tends to narrow our peripheral vision. That is, we literally see
less when we are distracted. Without a doubt, handheld mobile phone use, any
task involves touching the mobile phone, talking to passenger in the front seat
and taking your eyes off the road will increase your risk of an accident.
These studies show that
driver judgement is a big factor but even with typical drive judgement, visual
and manual task will cause more accidents. Until we have self-driving cars, it
is reasonable to ban the worst offenders: handheld mobile and texting.
Here is what we know:
Pros vs Cons
- · Talking with
Hands
free mobile
|
Hand
held mobile
|
Better for driving
|
Worst for driving
|
It is not illegal/It is not easy to
enforce
|
It is easy to enforce/That should be
banned
|
It is not risk-free, Risk Range : 0.25-2.30
|
Highest risk of accident, Risk Range
: 1.20-2.49
|
It is not as safe as driving without
distractions
|
It is totally unsafe
|
- · Texting
Speech to text is dangerous
|
Touching to text is dangerous
|
Worse that driving drunk
|
The worst of all
|
That should be banned (speech to text,
score: 3.06 distraction level, where MIN is 1.0 & MAX is 5.0)
|
That should be banned (visual and
manual subtask, Risk Range: 1.91-4.51)
|
- · Trying to find your mobile
No problem at all
|
Dangerous, but if the driver uses good
judgement, then it is a limited hazardous
|
When you look at the risk and the carnage
on the roads, it is questionable whether humans should be driving cars at all.
Talking on mobile is about the same cognitive
load as talking to someone/passenger in the front seat.
Should
talking to a passenger be banned? , yet nobody is suggesting banning
passengers from talking to driver.
|
Listening to Audio-book is less cognitive load
as a conversation or talking but the driver might be listening to the
Audio-book close to 100% of the time.
Should
Audio-books be banned from cars?
|
A teenage driver is about the same risk as a
legally drunk driver. Yet, a teenage driver has to actually drive in order to
learn how or know-how.
Should
teenage driver and/or drunk driver be banned from cars?
|
No comments:
Post a Comment