Should mobile phones be banned in cars?

                                     Should mobile phones be banned in cars?

    We all know that mobile phone that mobile phones are a distraction in cars. It is annoying and frightening to see people taking on their hand-held mobile phones while driving, especially, when their behavior creates a hazardous situation for everyone on the road. However, banning mobile phones use in cars is like stuffing a Genie into the bottle. There are certain obvious cases were mobile phone use truly should be banned, such as teenage drivers and bus drivers but there are a lot of people who depend on communicating while driving.

    Below we show the results of two recent studies:

AAA study

    This study showed the rank of distraction and gave the distraction level a score from 1.0 to 5.0. Here are the results:

No distractions	1.00
Radio on	1.21
Audio book	1.75
Hands-free mobile phone	2.27 (talking only, not looking at the mobile phone)
Talking to passenger	2.33 (passenger unaware of surroundings)
Hand-held mobile phone	2.45
Speech to text	3.06
Operational span task	5.00 (solving a math problem while trying to remember a fact)

Virginia Tech & NHTSA study

    This study found that the risk of an accident depended on the specific task associated with mobile phones. Here are the results:

Task	Risk  Range (with 95% confidence)
Hand held mobile phone use	1.20-2.49
Portable Hands-free mobile phone use	0.49-2.30
Integrated Hands-free mobile phone use	0.25-1.31
Visual and manual subtask	1.91-4.51

Putting things in perspective, accident risk depends on a number of other factors:

• ·         Speed              

Driving (MPH)	Risk
1	5%
10	1.62%
20	2.65%

• ·         Choice of roads

There is a huge variation in accident risk depending on the choice of road. The accident rate on a complex urban arterial road is about 10 times higher than a motorway.

• ·         Age

Drivers under 25 years old are at 3x risk of having an accident. Old age is not a big problem until the driver gets quite old around 70 years old.

• ·         Gender

Men get in more fatal accidents. Women get in slightly more fender benders.

• ·         Alcohol

In California State, a blood alcohol concentration of 0.08 is the legal limit but any amount of alcohol is dangerous. A legal drunk driver, about two drinks for most people, is about equal to teenage driver.

Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC)	Relative Risk
0.00	1.0
0.05	1.8
0.08	3.2
0.12	7.1
0.21	30.5

• ·         More factors

•              All drivers think they are better drivers than they                        really are.
•              Some drivers have mental deficits anger issues that                     make them far more dangerous than the rest of                           population.
•               Citations for moving violations predict how likely                     you will be to get in an accident.

These studies are ones of many that show that any form of talking puts a cognitive load on the brain and causes a degree of distraction. Also, anything that puts a load on the brain also tends to narrow our peripheral vision. That is, we literally see less when we are distracted. Without a doubt, handheld mobile phone use, any task involves touching the mobile phone, talking to passenger in the front seat and taking your eyes off the road will increase your risk of an accident.

These studies show that driver judgement is a big factor but even with typical drive judgement, visual and manual task will cause more accidents. Until we have self-driving cars, it is reasonable to ban the worst offenders: handheld mobile and texting.

Here is what we know:

                    Pros                    vs                       Cons

• ·         Talking with

Hands free mobile	Hand held mobile
Better for driving	Worst for driving
It is not illegal/It is not easy to enforce	It is easy to enforce/That should be banned
It is not risk-free, Risk Range : 0.25-2.30	Highest risk of accident, Risk Range : 1.20-2.49
It is not as safe as driving without distractions	It is totally unsafe

• ·         Texting

Speech to text is dangerous	Touching to text is dangerous
Worse that driving drunk	The worst of all
That should be banned (speech to text, score: 3.06 distraction level, where MIN is 1.0 & MAX is 5.0)	That should be banned (visual and manual subtask, Risk Range: 1.91-4.51)

• ·         Trying to find your mobile

No problem at all

Dangerous, but if the driver uses good judgement, then it is a limited hazardous

When you look at the risk and the carnage on the roads, it is questionable whether humans should be driving cars at all.

Talking on mobile is about the same cognitive load                    as talking to someone/passenger in the front seat.          Should talking to a passenger be banned? , yet                          nobody is suggesting banning passengers from                          talking to driver.

Listening to Audio-book is less cognitive load as a                    conversation or talking but the driver might be                          listening to the Audio-book close to 100% of the time.          Should Audio-books be banned from cars?

A teenage driver is about the same risk as a legally drunk         driver. Yet, a teenage driver has to actually drive in order         to learn how or know-how.          Should teenage driver and/or drunk driver be banned                from cars?

Fisker Reveals Production Version of Luxury Electric Car

DECEMBER 2, 2008 BY NICK CHAMBERS 25 COMMENTS

X

Hello fellow Stumbler! Don't forget to give me a thumbs up and subscribe to the RSS feed if you like this page!

      

Gearing up for an offical public debut at the 2009 North American International Auto Show next month, Fisker Automotive has released photos of what they’re calling the final production version of the Fisker Karma luxury plug-in hybrid electric sedan set to start rolling of the production line at the end of next year.

It looks like there were very few modifications between the exterior of the show car Fisker had on display at last year’s Detroit Auto Show and the just released shots of the production version. The only differences really have to do with the size of the front grille and the air intake. It won’t be known what changes were made to the interior until the official public unveiling at the auto show next month.

With starting price of $87,900, the Karma is not cheap (although it’s a relative steal when compared to the $120K+ Tesla Roadstercompetition). Fisker says the first Karmas will be delivered in November 2009 and that all orders through mid-2010 are already sold out.

The production Fisker Karma will have an all-electric range of 50 miles (80km), after which the gasoline engine kicks in and charges a lithium ion battery pack which in turn powers the car as a normal parallel hybrid. Fisker estimates that most Karma drivers who charge the Karma overnight and commute less than 50 miles per day will be able to achieve an average fuel economy of 100 mpg (2.4L/100km) per year.

As opposed to a plug-in hybrid like the much touted Chevy Volt, instead of a series hybrid sytem the Karma uses a parallel hybridsystem — meaning it uses gas and electric power at high speeds in parallel using a common mechanical drivetrain.

Fisker has been riding a wave of good press and news in the last few months including the announcement of a huge design center openingin Pontiac, MI, while their main competitor for the luxury environmentally-minded car market, Tesla, has been in a bit of adownturn on bad economic news.