Showing posts with label usability. Show all posts
Showing posts with label usability. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Session Replay: New tools are emerging that provide additional layers of website analytics information.

Session replay

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Session replay is the ability to replay a visitor's journey on a web site or within a web application. Replay can include the user's view (browser or screen output), user input (keyboard and mouse inputs), and logs of network events or console logs. It can be used in studying web site usability and customer behavior as well handling customer service questions as the full customer journey with all interactions can be replayed.
There are generally two ways to capture and replay visitor sessions, tag-free server side and client side.

Tag-free server side

Solutions capture all website traffic and replay every visitor interaction, from every device, including all mobile users from any location. Sessions are replayed step-by-step, providing the ability to search, locate and analyse aspects of a visitors session including clicks and form entry. Server side solutions require hardware and software to be installed "on premise".
The main providers of server side session replay solutions are:
Cloudmeter is now part of Splunk[1] and is no longer available as a separate solution.

Client side

There are many tag based solutions that offer video replay of a visitors session. These solutions can also show mouse movements and clicks. The underlying data for the videos is recorded by tagging pages. Some advanced tools are able to access the DOM directly and can play back most interactions with a high degree of accuracy.
The main providers of tag based session replay solutions are:

References

http://www.sessioncam.com/blog/what-is-session-replay/

Monday, September 01, 2014

Yandex.Direct and Google AdWords compared



Google + Yandex

Yandex.Direct and Google AdWords compared

The Russian search engine marketing (SEM) market is unique and, to a large extent, different from the SEM-markets of other countries. The main difference lies in the fact that most of the search traffic is concentrated on the local search engine Yandex.
According to various estimates, Yandex’s share of search engine traffic in Russia ranges from 60% to 65%, while the share of Google, its closest follower, is about 25%. Thus, the main competition in the SEM market unfolds between the content providers Yandex.Direct and Google AdWords. In terms of functionality, these systems have differences.

  • Ad formats
Both systems place text ads but with different restrictions. The header length on Yandex.Direct can be no longer than 33 characters, while Google AdWords allows for 25. The length of text ads is limited to 75 characters on Yandex.Direct and to two lines 35 word long lines on AdWords. The average length of words in Russian is longer than in English.Long titles and texts characterize Yandex.Direct as being a system that suits the peculiarities of the Russian language better and is more adapted for the Russian market.
In 2013, Yandex introduced another ad format that is different from the Google AdWords formats. For advertisements that are placed on partner sites of Yandex’s advertising network (called YAN), it is now possible to add images. The main feature of this format is that it can be added for remarketing ads, which undoubtedly greatly increases their effectiveness.
  • Usability and flexibility
Yandex.Direct system has a relatively simple and intuitive interface. Its simplicity makes it more popular among Russian advertisers, especially those whose experiences in contextual advertising are relatively weak. However, for experienced advertisers, AdWords is a more user-friendly system that provides important tools for mass editing, flexible configuration, and quick optimization. All of these features make AdWords more attractive and very popular among advertisers with thousands, and even tens of thousands of ads and keyword phrases.
  • Manage advertising display position
Yandex Direct shows each advertiser the recommended rates for taking up a specific position in the contextual landscape that allows an advertiser to at least get the right ad block. Google AdWords does not give this opportunity to be in a requested position. This factor is an issue for Russian advertisers when dealing with AdWords.
  • Advertising networks
The major sources of traffic for both systems are their own search engines. However, both systems have a network of partner sites. The ad networks of both systems also includes a variety of content-based, news, entertainment, and business sites. In addition, Yandex.Direct shows up in the results of search engine portals Mail.ru and Rambler, which traditionally are third and fourth place in terms of search traffic.
The size and quality of these networks is difficult to compare objectively, but they can be compared on the flexibility of settings and placement targeting. Google AdWords offers more targeting options such as remarketing, targeting by user interest, targeting by site category, and targeting by keyword. Yandex offers the following targeting capabilities: retargeting, targeting by keyword, and targeting by user interest. However, it is impossible to control the interests, as they are automatically matched to the selected keywords. Yandex does not give a choice of partners for ad placement, while Google allows this. The format of ads placed on partner networks also differ. Yandex.Direct allows you to place text ads or text and image ads (ads with a picture), while Google AdWords allows you to place text ads, and banner ads in various formats, as well as promotional videos on Youtube.
  • Competition and cost-per-click
Having the largest share of the search market makes Yandex.Direct more attractive to advertisers than Google AdWords. Today, according to experts, the number of advertisers is over 350,000. Therefore, it is generally believed that competition on Yandex.Direct is greater and fast growth bid in many niches. As a result, cost-per-click (CPC) for Yandex.Direct in higher on average than for Google AdWords.
  • Management conversions and CPA
Every year Russian advertisers become more “advanced” and it is necessary to manage not only the placement of advertising, but also its economic returns. AdWords for many years now gives advertisers a tool that enables them to manage conversions with reference to CPA. Yandex has not yet provided anything like this. At the end of 2013, Yandex Direct finally released a similar tool, which allows the setting of weekly budgets and a desired target price action. Comparing the two tools is of course difficult. It can only be added that experts say the Yandex tool provides a significant impact on contextual media campaigns.
  • Availability API for third-party developers
The growth of Internet penetration in Russia and the fact that Russia has become the European country with the largest number of Internet users have resulted in the growth of keyword queries on search engines. This makes large advertisers develop their own applications for context systems for the automation various processes via API. Yandex.Direct API is open to virtually anyone, while Google AdWords accepts only large advertisers with high turnover and a payment history of no less than six months. In addition, advertisers are forced to undergo a certification process of their applications for the Google AdWords API, which is certainly a barrier.
  • Automation
The Russian contextual advertising market continues to grow at a rapid pace, which is resulting in a more complex environment for its management and control. Such a situation is driving the development of the automation advertising market in Russia. The period of 2013-2014 is marked by the advent of various automation systems. It is also worth noting the appearance of Russian startups in the segment, such as Alytics; the increased competition from foreign players like Marin Software and Adobe AdLens; and a change in strategy among market veterans, characterized by a round of new investments into the platform eLama.
  • Discount policy
Yandex.Direct has a special Discount policy for regular customers with large advertising budgets. The discounts can be as high as 23%. Google AdWords does not offer discounts to its customers.
*
Summing up the comparison of the two systems, there are several key points. Yandex.Direct is a leader in search engine traffic. Google AdWords provides more sophisticated and advanced tools for settings and targeting. Competition on Yandex.Direct is more intense than on Google AdWords. It is worth noting that, despite the many differences between the systems over the past few years, they approach each other and inevitably become more like each other. This trend will continue in the future, while each player will hope to come up with something unique to strengthen his position and push out his competitor.
Alexander Egorov is the Director of Development for the smart content platform Alytics. He is also an expert on CPA-campaigns and effective online media, and a consultant for CPA-contextual advertising campaigns. He has more than 9 years of experience in integrated online marketing (including to some degree within CPA and ROI) and contextual advertising campaigns for: Price.ru, Credit Bank of Moscow, Aeroflot Airlines, Tour Operators Pegas, DSBW and TezTour, Svyaznoy Bank, Saxo Bank, Central Department Store, MIAN, publisher Ferra, and the Finn Flare store.
This article is an excerpt from a comprehensive research study on Russian e-commerce and online marketing channels by East-West Digital News. To receive an executive summary at no charge please contact report@ewn.com. 

Friday, August 22, 2014

UX, CRO, SEO: What Does It All Mean And Where Does It All Come Together?

Koozai
Koozai

UX, CRO, SEO: What Does It All Mean And Where Does It All Come Together?

Ned Poulter
by Ned Poulter on 12th December 2012

User ExperienceNed Poulter looks at where the line falls between UX, CRO, SEO and many other web design disciplines whilst ultimately asking how you can leverage all of these aspects as somebody working in SEO.

Usability = SEO

The lines between UX and SEO are becoming increasingly blurred. Largely this is because many SEO techniques are now also in-line with UX best practice; they go hand-in-hand. Many of us have been aware of this mutually beneficial relationship between SEO and usability for a long time but have chosen to pay little attention to the finer details, either the client’s budget doesn’t cater for it or there are more important changes taking place and UX changes fall by the wayside.
Some top SEO companies like SEOGadgetDistilled, Seer Interactive and Koozai have naturally begun to offer UX and CRO services to complement their existing client offering, the reason for this? The skills to offer this were often already in-house and by optimising the entire process of website conversions, more so than simply getting traffic to the site, this allows us to expand upon the remit of traditional SEO and branch into user experience and CRO and ultimately, help our clients’ make more money. This post will explore the crossing of boundaries between the disciplines, and will aim to provide you with:
  • An insight into approaching these for best practice
  • How to communicate SEO changes in terms of user experience improvements
  • A number of recommended UX/CRO tools that can be utilised to improve user experience on your site

User experience wheel

Google <3s Good UX

When you look closely at some of the algorithm updates over the last 12 months, specifically:
  • Page Layout Algorithm change (read more here)
  • Google ‘Venice’ update – serving more geographically appropriate results based on your location (more here)
  • Even the debate on how page speed is now being using as a quality signal and improvements can help improve a site’s ranking (something that Gianluca recommended in this post)
Taking these updates into consideration you start to realise that ultimately Google’s goal is ensuring that their index consists of the best results on the Internet, both in terms of relevancy and also user experience. If Google serves a website that offers a bad user experience causing a user to go back to the SERPs and ‘try again’, then that reflects badly on them; to Google this can be a vicious cycle and ultimately they want to avoid this!

Communicating SEO without mentioning SEO

One issue that many SEOs are commonly faced with is the inability to communicate why site optimisation recommendations should be applied in terms that the client or developer, can understand. SEOs, more often than not, need to drop the jargon and speak to them like a human, one way of doing this is to describe your recommendations in terms of improving user experience, clients can relate to this. How many times have you found yourself in a situation where even before making the recommendations a client is already looking cross-eyed and is baffled by the mentions of ‘XML sitemaps’, ‘linking root domains’ and ‘robots.txt files’?
I’ve found great successes when working with clients in approaching SEO a bit like an academic discipline, starting a site audit with a series of presentations that I dub ‘SEOSchool’. However, I’ve found that with some clients this doesn’t always resonate, they are time-pressed and more often than not simply don’t care, it’s a bit-part of their overall marketing budget and, after all, worrying about this is what they’re paying me for! So you persevere, make your recommendations, see the on-site optimisation take place, begin your day-to-day of SEO work, site traffic begins to rise and results start to materialise. Next you get a call from your client, you’ve now got their attention and they want to know what you have done to make that happen. Sound familiar? We’re back to square one…
I’ve been in this situation a few times now and personally have found that more and more that when communicating with some non technically-savvy clients SEO is best explained by focusing on how many common SEO fixes for a site are simply a process to create a better user experience. I’d urge you to do the same. Next time you’re trying to explain certain SEO changes to a client or developer, consider approaching the explanation in a slightly different way, like highlighting potential gains like for every 1 second of load time, conversion drops 7%.
Below I have identified several areas that I have found SEO and CRO techniques can be employed in tandem, including mentions of notable tools that can help you do this…

Optimised Page Titles & META Descriptions: Include Relevant and Clear CTAs

This actually lends itself to a conversation I’ve had with a number of SEOs lately regarding optimisation of page titles and META descriptions, and how ‘old school’ examples are dirtying up the SERPs:
  • They completely fail to deliver a good user experience to the end user
  • It offers little to no information of what the page contains
  • Contain no call-to-action
  • This can actually have a more negative effect than positive
While not the worst I’ve seen, consider the example below for a search for ‘cheap car insurance’, More Than Insurance are trying overly hard to optimise their homepage:
More Than Meta Current
  • Truncated page title
  • Use | of | piping | to | separate | keywords
  • Confusion through attempt to target multiple keywords
However this would be much better:
More Than Meta New
  • Clear call-to-action in page title
  • Convincing persuasive language in META description
  • Use of ‘today’ adds immediacy to call-to-action
Many SEOs are turning to others to help write their page titles and METAs, focused on including convincing sales-orientated language with prominent call-to-actions for the user. Try this yourself; once you’ve identified your target keywords, try giving the role of writing page titles and META descriptions to your sales team, or even your PPC team.
Tip: I’d strongly recommend using SEOMofo’s Snippet Optimiser tool to test and visualise recommendations.

Split Test, Then Split Test Again, Then Split Test Again…

Writing page titles and META descriptions in the way identified above is just a start, consider the full journey your user takes through your website once they have reached it. Split testing page titles and call-to-actions allows you to test and iterate to create the optimal experience for your users. There are a multitude of tools out there to help you do this, but I’d certainly recommend looking into three that are incredibly affordable:
Don’t see how this can help? See this example from Highrise where they increased conversions by 30% simply through using Google Content Experiments (formerly Google Website Optimiser).
Worst performer in test
Highrise worst performing page
Conversion increase of 30%
Highrise Best Performing Version

Pay Attention to Information Architecture

Information architecture is a fundamental building block of user experience on your site, ask yourself:
  • Can individuals find what they’re looking for easily on your site? 
  • How were your top-level categories selected? 
  • Did you ask your website visitors/test to form this decision on top-level categories? 
While often overlooked, URLs are a classic example of signposting for the user. Think how many times you refer to the URL in SERPs, or glance at the URL bar in your browser to help you understand where you are on the site. Changing URLs can be an arduous but very rewarding process. Follow simple rules for this and ensure that they:
  • Maintain consistency
  • Support site structure
  • Are intelligible to humans
Information architecture is a vitally important aspect of your website, without a rigorous testing process some areas of your site may simply not be discovered by users. There are a number of tools to help test your information architecture, below I’ve recommended some of the best:
  • TreeJack - ‘Information architecture validation software’, allows you to test your information architecture without visual distractions.
  • Usabilia - Acquire feedback on you site layout and information architecture even when it’s in design/wire-framing stages.

Gather Feedback, Constantly Iterate

Listen to your customers, constantly test and iterate based on the feedback you receive. There are simply hundreds of tools out there to do this, but consider the following tools to approach this:
On-Site/Page Feedback
  • Qualaroo - On-page feedback, try asking purposefully broad questions like ‘what one thing would you change about this page’
  • Olark - On-site live chat, helps you rectify issues users are having when navigating your site and help them to complete their conversions.
  • 4Q - Customer feedback
Session Recording
Recording your user’s journey will allow you to understand better how they are navigating the site and to identify areas of potential improvement, recommended tools:
Crowdsource User Feedback
Much like the on-site/page feedback, you can open this up in a broader way using these tools:

Good News! You’re Probably Already Doing It

User Experience
As marketers, our job is focused on influencing people’s opinion based on an understanding of their needs and wants. Improving user experience helps to remove instances where individuals get frustrated online, which in turn can have a negative effect on your brand as a whole.
The good news is you’re likely to already be aware of this, you just need to secure some time and resources to focus on user testing, split testing and iterating based on this feedback. Trust me, you will not be disappointed. I predict that in 2 years time the best SEO agencies out there will have flourished through offering CRO services and conducting user testing, make sure you don’t miss the boat.
To finish, I could not put it better than StateofSearch blogger Gianluca Fiorelli pointed out in his article ‘What is Google all about now’ (referencing Google’s own company philosophy):
“Focus on the user and all else will follow…”
The views expressed in this post are those of the author so may not represent those of the Koozai team.
Image Credit:
User Experience Wheel and User Experience from BigStock
Ned Poulter

Ned Poulter

Ned Poulter is an enthusiastic and passionate SEO, currently working as the SEO Manager for Quirk London. Ned is a familiar face at SEO conferences across the UK, can often be found discussing SEO and digital marketing on Twitter, as well as blogging for State of Search.
down arrow

Your Free Whitepaper

Getting Started With Conversion Rate Optimisation
Getting Started With Conversion Rate Optimisation
Download this whitepaper now and get a new one every month!